Legal Opinion

Rothschild Bros. Hat Co. v. Rolnick Bros.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1930No. 10486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

Rothschild Bros. Hat Company, a corporation of St. Louis, Mo., sued Rolnick Bros., a partnership composed of George and Harry Rolnick, of Dalllas, Tex., to recover a balance of $574.13, with interest, due on an open account originally in the sum of $1,074.13, the alleged value of a bill of hats sold and shipped by plaintiff to defendant.

Defendants having been discharged in bankruptcy, after the accrual of the indebtedness, the suit was brought under a provision of (section 35, title 11, U. S. Code [11 USCA § 35]) section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act, on the alleged ground that defendants obtained…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strang v. BradnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Fitzhugh v. Franco-Texas Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Emery v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Stewart & ThreadgillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Wall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API