Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. Segur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

In an article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding to review and annul a determination of the Board of Zoning-Appeals of the Town of Bethlehem, Albany County, granting the application of the intervener for a special exception for the construction and operation of an automatic car wash facility *133upon premises situate largely in a district zoned for business, petitioners, nearby property owners, appeal from an adverse order of the Supreme Court at Special Term.

The zoning ordinance provides, inter alia, that “ No building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected or structurally altered,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Syosset Holding Corp. v. SchlimmNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Von der Heide v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Von der Heide v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Plotinsky v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Foland v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. KeesIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Brandt v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Goldstein v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Tobin v. Board of Zoning & Appeals of the Inc. Village of ManorhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Highpoint Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API