Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1944No. Civ. 7108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEEK, J.By this action petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Stanislaus County from further proceeding in a case previously submitted to it for decision after trial, entitled J. H. Fairchilds v. John Picha, et al. The facts as disclosed by the various documents on file herein appear as follows:

On March 31, 1942, Arthur Tomlinson and Everett Tomlinson, who were engaged in the business of ranchers under the name of Tomlinson Brothers, had in their employ one John Picha. In the course of his employment on that day Picha fell and was injured. Everett Tomlinson…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Winsette v. WinsetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Platt v. Union Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ralph C. Sutro Co. v. Paramount Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Fair v. Fountain Valley School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Mills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Bell v. Samaritan Medical Clinic, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API