Legal Opinion

Medtronic Ave Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., A/K/A Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Cordis Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 30, 2004No. 04-1042PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by Cordis Corp. (“Cordis”), the defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit brought against it by Medtronic AVE, Inc. (“Medtronic AVE”), requires us to decide whether Cordis’s claim that it has a license to use certain patents should be determined by an arbitrator. The District Court held that the dispute was not arbitrable, and enjoined arbitration. We will vacate and remand. Because the parties are fully familiar with the background facts and procedural history we need not set them forth, and limit our discussion to our ratio decidendi.1

I

Medtronic AVE’s suit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miron v. BDO Seidman, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. United States ex rel. Hagerty v. Cyberonics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  3. Angrisani v. Financial Technology VenturesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Epix v. MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIESNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. Port Erie Plastics, Inc. v. Uptown Nails, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API