Legal Opinion
Glover v. Miro
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2001No. 00-7663PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge MICHAEL wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge:
This case addresses whether defendant Eric Glover received constitutionally ineffective assistance of. The district court found that Glover had not proven actual prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). It nevertheless granted a writ of habeas corpus to Glover under the perse prejudice reasoning of United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kim Moss v. Gerald HofbauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Michael William Lenz v. Gerald K. Washington, Acting Warden, Sussex I State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Earl Richmond, Jr. v. Marvin L. Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.