Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 2015No. 14-35553PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and Umpqua Watersheds (collectively, Casca-dia) challenge the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ (BIA) approval of the Middle Forks Kokwel timber sale (the Kokwel Project), a plan by the Coquille Indian Tribe (the Tribe) to harvest 268 acres of timber in the Coquille Forest in southwest Oregon. Cascadia argues the BIA violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., because it did not adequately consider the cumulative envi ronmental impact of the Kokwel Project in light of a previously approved harvest, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Twp. of Bordentown v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Presidio Historical Ass'n v. Presidio TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Idaho Conservation League v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- WildEarth Guardians v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.