Legal Opinion

Plumbers & Pipefitters, Local 367 v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2013No. 6770 S-14664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A union and a municipality entered into collective bargaining to renew the union’s expiring contract. When negotiations broke down, the parties entered into arbitration, but the arbitrator’s proposed decision failed to garner the necessary municipal assembly votes to become binding on the parties. Under the municipality’s labor ordinances, the assembly’s failure to approve the arbitrator’s decision resulted in an impasse, with each party given a remedy: the municipality could implement its last best offer presented at arbitration, and the union could go on strike. However, the union’s…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. SANDERS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API