Legal Opinion

Tabor v. Big Pittsburg Consolidated Silver Mining Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

Decided January 3, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

motion to quash attachment.)

1Opinion of the CourtHallett, J.

The substance of the complaint is, that defendant has entered the Matchless mine in Lake county, which is owned by plaintiff, and has taken therefrom ore of the value of $109,388, and has sold and converted the same to its own use. The fourth paragraph of the complaint is as follows:

“That plaintiff now elects to waive the trespass so as aforesaid committed by defendant in mining and getting said ore, dirt and mineral bearing rock from said Matchless lode, mine and premises, and sues defendant in an action for money had and received, for plaintiff’s use, for the money received by defendant for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norden v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  2. S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Davidson v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. Graves v. StrozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  5. Babcock v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crist v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API