Legal Opinion

Best Buy Co. v. Hitachi, Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2014No. MDL No. 1917; Case No. C-07-5944-SCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*450 ORDER DENYING BEST BUTS OBJECTIONS TO THE SPECIAL MASTER’S ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Samuel Conti, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is Direct Action Plaintiffs (“DAPs”) the Best Buy entities’1 (“Best Buy”) objection to the Special Master’s 2 Order (“Order”) granting in part and denying in part Best Buy’s motion for protective order. ECF No. 2689 (“Objection”) (filed under seal).3 Defendants oppose Best Buy’s objection, and argue the Court should deny the objection and affirm the Special Master’s order. ECF No. 2685…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Wilk v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Meijer, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BHARWANI v. LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Brighton Trustees LLC v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. EFG BANK AG, CAYMAN BRANCH v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API