Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that trial counsel’s representation of defendant, viewed in its entirety, provided him with effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147; People v Trait, 139 AD2d 937, lv denied 72 NY2d 867). Defendant’s contention that the trial *871court’s charge on the defense of justification was inadequate has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Harrell, 59 NY2d 620). In any event, the court’s charge on the defense of justification was adequate (see, People v Bowick, 191 AD2d 1019, lv…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. De GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API