Greene v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
HARDBERGER, Justice.
This case involves a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. When evaluat- mg such an appellate point, we should examine counsel’s performance in its totality. Few lawyers turn in a perfect performance in a trial — it is simply too complex a task for perfection. Still there are minimum standards of advocacy that cannot be trespassed without undermining the confidence in the conviction. When this occurs, it violates the Sixth Amendment Constitutional guarantees of effective counsel. In this case, among many errors, the defense counsel intentionally impeached his own…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Ex Parte WelbornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ali v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Paez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Easley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- Ashley Eva Morrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
- Francisco Perez Arcos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.