Legal Opinion
Butler v. Michigan State Disbursement Unit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 2007No. Docket 271818PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.
Flaintiff appeals a Court of Claims order that granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.
Defendant, Michigan State Disbursement Unit, is the state entity charged with collecting and disbursing child support payments. MCL 400.236(1) and (2). Flain-tiff has received child support payments since at least 1999. In accordance with MCL 400.238(2), defendant retained the accrued interest on support payments that passed through its system and used it to offset its operating costs. MCL 400.238 states, in pertinent part:(1) While held by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Silver Creek Drain District v. Extrusions Division, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AFT Michigan v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- AFT Michigan v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Lyon Charter Township v. McDonald's USA, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gerard Matzen// Marsha McLane, in Her Official Capacity as Director of Texas Civil Commitment Office, and the Texas Civil Commitment Office v. Marsha McLane, in Her Official Capacity as Director of Texas Civil Commitment Office, and the Texas Civil Commitment Office// Cross-Appellee, Gerard Matzen, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
- Timothy L Johnson v. Public School Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016