Franklin Point, Inc. v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Cousins
The trial court prefaced its opinion by indicating that the court had read the pleadings of the parties "with keen interest,” noting that this was a case of "sizable magnitude.” The court then stated that "Illinois law is well settled that specific performance of construction projects is forbidden as a matter of law.” The court cited three particular Illinois cases: Besinger v. National Tea Co. (1966), 75 Ill. App. 2d 395, 221 N.E.2d 156; Yonan v. Oak Park Federal Savings & Loan Association (1975), 27 Ill. App. 3d 967, 326 N.E.2d 773; and Bissett v. Gooch (1980), 87 Ill. App. 3d 1132, 409…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Yonan v. Oak Park Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Intini v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Bissett v. GoochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Grayson-Robinson Stores, Inc. & Iris Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- New Park Forest Associates II v. Rogers Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.