Legal Opinion · Dissent

Franklin Point, Inc. v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1995No. 1-94-3537Published

1DissentJustice Cousins

The trial court prefaced its opinion by indicating that the court had read the pleadings of the parties "with keen interest,” noting that this was a case of "sizable magnitude.” The court then stated that "Illinois law is well settled that specific performance of construction projects is forbidden as a matter of law.” The court cited three particular Illinois cases: Besinger v. National Tea Co. (1966), 75 Ill. App. 2d 395, 221 N.E.2d 156; Yonan v. Oak Park Federal Savings & Loan Association (1975), 27 Ill. App. 3d 967, 326 N.E.2d 773; and Bissett v. Gooch (1980), 87 Ill. App. 3d 1132, 409…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yonan v. Oak Park Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Intini v. SchwartzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bissett v. GoochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. In re the Arbitration between Grayson-Robinson Stores, Inc. & Iris Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. New Park Forest Associates II v. Rogers Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API