Legal Opinion

Easley v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1986No. PB-C-84-469PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ROY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on briefs and stipulations of the parties. The parties agreed that the only issues to be decided were legal issues, and therefore agreed to submit the case on briefs. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, which incorporate the stipulations entered into by the parties.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiffs Catherine Easley, Bessie Jenkins, Carolyn Johnson, Mary Matthews and Alice Smith were Medicaid recipients pursuant to Title XIX of the Social Security Act at the time the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Banks v. Secretary Of Indiana Family And Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Lewis Ex Rel. Young v. RendellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Banks v. Secretary of the Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
  4. Rosen v. Tennessee Commissioner of Finance & AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2002
  5. Norfolk County Hospital v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API