Legal Opinion

Banks v. Secretary of the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided April 2, 1992No. S91-340MPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

Marie Banks contends that Indiana’s Medicaid procedures offend the Due Process Clause because they do not allow Medicaid recipients notice and an opportunity to contest denials of reimbursement of claims filed by their health care providers. Several motions in this cause are now before the court. The Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services — the “federal defendant”— moves to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Banks v. Secretary Of Indiana Family And Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Smith v. Keycorp Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Catanzano ex rel. Catanzano v. DowlingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
  4. Banks v. Secretary of the Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. CATANZANO BY CATANZANO v. DowlingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API