Legal Opinion

Mullinax v. Hufham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1959No. 6 Div. 195, 196, 197PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal in three cases which were submitted to the jury on a single count in each case. By consent, the cases were consolidated and tried together on substantially the same evidence. Plaintiffs are husband, wife, and a minor child suing separately for loss of services, damage to husband’s automobile, and personal injuries to wife and child, all arising out of a collision of the automobile, driven by the wife, with a motor vehicle alleged to have been negligently operated or controlled by defendants. There was a jury verdict and judgment for defendants in each case.

Th…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Cook v. Sheffield Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. German-American Wholesale Optical Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. SchmaelingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Lee v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Kennedy v. General Transport Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Parker v. McGahaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Rowell v. McColloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API