Legal Opinion

United States v. Nessanbaum

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 10, 1953No. 10940PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

On April 8, 1952, an indictment was filed in the court below charging the defendant, Hyman Nessanbaum with perjury. 18 U.S.C. § 1621. 1 The indictment stated that Nessanbaum, appearing as a witness in the case of United States v. Mario De Carlo on or about January 29, 1952, in the United States District Court of New Jersey, knowingly and willfully gave false testimony under oath as follows:

“Upon being questioned; ‘Do you mean to say you can’t now tell us, either yes, or no, whether this man * * * [De Carlo] is the man that rented your bam?[ 2 ]
“The defendant, Hyman…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Goins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Roberto Flores-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. James Arena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API