Legal Opinion

Brazell v. Uddenberg

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 6, 2022No. 3:19-cv-01084Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE L. BRAZELL, Case No.: 19-CV-1084 JLS (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AMENDED 13 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS v. CORPUS 14 CLIFF J. UDDENBERG, Commander, 15 United States Navy Commandant, (ECF No. 15) Naval Brig Miramar, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is Petitioner Jesse Brazell’s (“Petitioner”) Amended 20 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (“Am. Pet.,” ECF No. 21 15). Also before the Court is the Government’s (“Government” or “Respondent”) Answer 22 and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API