Legal Opinion
Sloman v. Tambrands, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 2, 1993No. Civ. L-92-2549PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
In this civil action removed to this Court by defendant Tambrands pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 et seq., the Court is called upon to decide the motions for partial summary judgement filed by defendant, Tam-brands, Inc. (“Tampax”) with respect to (i) federal preemption of plaintiffs failure to warn claim and (ii) punitive damages. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will, by separate order, GRANT both motions for partial summary judgement.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Plaintiff Marie Sloman used tampons regularly for over ten years. (Sloman Dep. at 44). “On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Joyce A. Moore v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Rinehart v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988
- Stewart v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1987
- Meyer v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gina Lowe v. Sporicidin InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. AmmermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,061 National Bank of Commerce of El Dorado, as Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Armon Wilson, Deceased v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. Playtex Family Products Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Lulov v. Tambrands, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.