Legal Opinion

Locke v. Vanderark

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1992No. 90CA0099PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge REED.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff, John Locke, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Gary Vanderark, M.D. We affirm.

In the months of February, September, and October 1979, the defendant, a neurosurgeon, performed ventricular shunt surgeries to alleviate plaintiff’s condition of hydrocephalus. The purpose of these operations was to drain excessive cerebrospinal fluid from the cranial area. This was to be accomplished by the placement of a shunt catheter through the right side of the brain. Such a catheter allows drainage…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Maria R. Navarro De Cosme v. Hospital PaviaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Russell v. First Am. Mtg. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Conrad v. ImataniColorado Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Askew v. GeraceColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. White v. Caterpillar, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Freedman v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API