In re Clark
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Almond, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection of claim 3 of appellant’s application entitled “Shot Container for Shotgun Cartridges.”1 The remaining claims, 1, 2 and 4-6, have been allowed.
The invention relates to a composite, one-piece plastic wad column for disposition within a shotgun cartridge. The wad column has an *925obturating2 wad portion and a shot container portion as illustrated in Figs, 5-9:
The shot container portion 23 of the wad column has a wall 22 with slits 24 and tabs 25 for easy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of Phil H. Hidy and William F. PhillipsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re EickmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re MattoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.