Legal Opinion

In re Clark

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 13, 1972No. 8649PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almond, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection of claim 3 of appellant’s application entitled “Shot Container for Shotgun Cartridges.”1 The remaining claims, 1, 2 and 4-6, have been allowed.

The invention relates to a composite, one-piece plastic wad column for disposition within a shotgun cartridge. The wad column has an *925obturating2 wad portion and a shot container portion as illustrated in Figs, 5-9:

The shot container portion 23 of the wad column has a wall 22 with slits 24 and tabs 25 for easy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Application of Phil H. Hidy and William F. PhillipsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. In re FielderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. In re EickmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. In re MattoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API