Legal Opinion

McLeod v. General Mills, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 23, 2015No. Civil No. 15-494 (JRT/HB)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION. JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court

In June 2012, defendant General Mills, Inc. (“General -Mills”) terminated approximately 850 employees as part of a corporate restructuring plan called “Project Refuel.” Elizabeth McLeod and 32 other persons aged 40 or above (“plaintiffs”) were among those laid off as part of the restructuring, and have brought this action alleging that they were improperly terminated in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”).1, , ”

General Mills…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API