Legal Opinion

Treisman v. Town of Bedford

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 9, 1989No. 87-096; No. 88-441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This consolidated appeal presents various challenges to superior court rulings in two zoning actions. Both actions arise from plaintiff Robert Treisman’s objections to defendant Dean Kamen’s construction of a heliport and use and storage of a helicopter at his property in Bedford. In case No. 87-096, defendants Kamen and the Town of Bedford appeal from a decision of the Superior Court {McHugh, J.) reversing the Bedford Zoning Board of Adjustment’s decision to grant Kamen a variance allowing the disputed uses. In case No. 88-441, the defendants appeal from a decision of the Superior Court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vlahos Realty Co. v. Little Boar's Head DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  2. McKinney v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  3. Town of Salem v. DurrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Bourgeois v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. City of Keene v. Gerry's Cash Market, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. Hannigan v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Nestor v. Town of Meredith Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Treisman v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Portsmouth Advocates, Inc. v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API