Legal Opinion
Hickey v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 8, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
31 N.J. Super. 114 (1954)
105 A.2d 872
GORDON HICKEY AND DANIEL HICKEY, TRADING AS ALPINE CASTLE, APPELLANTS,
v.
DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF ALPINE, RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 1, 1954.
Decided June 8, 1954.
Before Judges JAYNE, STANTON and HALL.
Mr. Leo Rosenblum argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Samuel B. Helfand, Deputy Attorney-General, argued the cause for Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of New…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Judge of the Circuit CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- In re the Appeal of SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Zicherman v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- Biscamp v. Twp. Council of the Twp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Bivona v. HockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fanwood v. RoccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Rajah Liquors v. Div. of Alcoholic Bev. ControlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Presbyterian Church v. DIV. OF ALCOHOLIC BEV. CONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- In Re SandersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Belmar v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.