Legal Opinion

In Re Settlement of Youngquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1938No. 31,762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 282 N.W. 272. The question is, where did Mrs. Youngquist have her settlement on February 18, 1937? She was a widow with a family, with her settlement in Renville county on and prior to December 5, 1935. She was then receiving a mother's pension of $65 per month, which was paid to her until December 5, 1936. On December 5, 1935, she moved from Renville to Redwood county. She employed two draymen. The service rendered by each was independent of the other. Each rendered a separate bill, which Renville county subsequently paid. Neither of them was authorized by the county to render…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. In Re Settlement SkogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Overseers of the poor of Windham v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844
  4. County of Redwood v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Settlement of WrobleskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Town of Swan River v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. City of Minneapolis v. County of BeltramiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. In Re Settlement of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. City of Minneapolis v. Village of HanoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API