Legal Opinion
(PC) Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 7, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01176Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD B. SPENCER, 1:20-cv-001176-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT 13 v. JUDGE TO THIS CASE 14 PULIDO-ESPARZA, et al., AND 15 Defenda nts. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 16 PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT CDCR FOR VIOLATION OF THE ADA; 17 THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR 18 FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 19 (ECF No. 13.) 20 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE BY APRIL 20, 2023 21 22 23 24 I. BACKGROUND 25…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.