Legal Opinion

Wisconsin v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 1941No. 48PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

This case, involving another application of the Wisconsin Privilege Dividend Tax considered in Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co., ante, p. 435, is governed by that decision except for a contention made by this respondent but not pressed here in Penney1's case.

The Commerce Clause is invoked. Büt it is too late in the day to find offense to that Clause because a state tax is imposed on corporate net income of an interstate enterprise which is attributable to earnings within the taxing state, Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board, 297 U. S. 441. That liability for such a tax is made con-, tingent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matson Nav. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. BeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API