United States v. Lamont Vanderhorst
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Lamont Marloe Vanderhorst appeals a decision of the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia denying his motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct a clerical error in his Pre-Sentence Report ("PSR"). According to Defendant, as a result of that clerical error, the district court wrongly sentenced Defendant as a career offender. In denying Defendant's motion, the District Court held that Rule 36 cannot serve as a vehicle for a defendant to pursue resentencing. Although we disagree with the district court's conclusion that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GoodwynCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Raymond Joseph LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Dwight JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Benton v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Brown v. HolzapfelDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2025
- United States v. Alvin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Austin LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.