Legal Opinion

Hantke v. Harris Ice Machine Works

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

On the morning of October 5, 1933, shortly before 8 o’clock, plaintiff was riding a motorcycle easterly on North Ainsworth street, Portland. The defendant, Preytag, was driving his automobile southerly on North Delaware avenue and in the intersection of these two streets the two vehicles collided'injuring plaintiff. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Harris Ice Machine Works, is liable for the negligence of defendant, Preytag, under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Preytag was taking his daughter and two other young ladies to the Jefferson high school intending thereafter to go to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Auer v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  4. Caver v. EggertonMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Brown v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Heide v. TCI INCORPORATEDOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Larkins v. Utah Copper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Buck Witt v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Bourus v. HagenWashington Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API