Legal Opinion

Heinkel v. Toberman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 1950No. 41782PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.

The appellants’ action seeks to enjoin Walter H. Toberman, as Secretary of State of the State of Missouri, from submitting a referendum to a vote of the people on “House Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 185,” enacted by the Sixty Fifth General Assembly and approved by, the Governor on August 27, 1949. The circuit court dismissed appellants’ petition because it failed to state a claim upon which appellants are entitled to obtain injunctive relief.

The statute in question will hereafter be referred to as house bill 185. It provides that, in order to provide funds for the construction and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. State Ex Rel. Pollock v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. McKinley Publishing Co. v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Detroit Automobile Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Thomas v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Boards of County Road Commissioners v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API