Legal Opinion

Musselman v. Barker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to !tbe 'district court for Harlan county. Tried below before 'Gasílin, -I. cited: Valentine v. ■Stewart, lb Cal. 387; Commonwealth v. Gibbs, 4 Gray, (Mass.,) 146'; Price vJGinnd Rapids, etc., It. JR. Co., 18 Ind. 137; Herrick dx. Catley, 1 Daly, (N. Y.,) 512; Sherwood v. SaratogaWashington P. P. Co., 15 Barb.

Read the full summary

Error to !tbe 'district court for Harlan county. Tried below before 'Gasílin, -I. cited: Valentine v. ■Stewart, lb Cal. 387; Commonwealth v. Gibbs, 4 Gray, (Mass.,) 146'; Price vJGinnd Rapids, etc., It. JR. Co., 18 Ind. 137; Herrick dx. Catley, 1 Daly, (N. Y.,) 512; Sherwood v. SaratogaWashington P. P. Co., 15 Barb. (Id.) 650; 2 Parsons-on 'Contracts, 67; Addison on Contracts, 581-4. cited-: Bliss, Gode Pleadings, 1st Ed. sec. 1; 3 Suth■erland on Damages, pp. 316, 317 ; Kniffenv. McConnell, 30 N. Y. 285; Shei-mcm v. Rawson, 102 Mass. 395; Leavitt i.v. Cutler, 37 Wis. 46; Price v. Grand…

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This action was instituted in the district court for damages resulting from the breach of a marriage contract, the damages being laid at $10,000. A jury trial was had, which resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant in error, and assessing her damages at $7,000. A motion for a new trial was filed, which was overruled when a judgment was rendered upon the verdict. Plaintiff in error, who was •defendant in the district court, brings the cause to this •court for review by proceedings in error.

The motion for a new trial was based upon the following grounds:

“1st. Because the verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Tubbs v. KleekIllinois Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kuhlman v. CargileNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Adams v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Kurpgeweit v. KirbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lauer v. BanningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API