Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Colorado Ltd. Gaming Control Commission

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1994No. 93CA2111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Defendant, Thomas L. Feeney, II, appeals the order of the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (Gaming Commission) revoking his limited gaming key employee license. We affirm.

Feeney originally applied for a key employee license and the Division of Gaming (Division) denied his application. Under the Limited Gaming Act of 1991, every retail gaming establishment must have a person holding such a license to be in charge of all limited gaming activities and available at all times when limited gaming is being conducted. See 12^t7.1-501(l)(e) (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B).

Feeney…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Elizondo v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Cottrell v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Mr. Lucky's, Inc. v. DolanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Hendricks v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tepley v. Public Employees Retirement Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Colorado Real Estate Commission v. BartlettColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Farmer v. Colorado Parks & Wildlife CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Ainsworth v. Colorado Division of GamingColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. In Re Aristocrat, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API