Legal Opinion

Loring v. Litman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 20, 1944No. 33,822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiffs are, and over a period of years have been, copartners engaged in the practice of law at Minneapolis. One of their regular clients was Sam London, who died testate a resident of Hennepin county on February 19, 1942. Defendant is the duly qualified and acting representative of his estate. The controversy which brings the case here arose out of a written contract which reads as follows:

*350“This Agreement, made this 7 day of February, 1939, by and between Sam London of Minneapolis, Minn., party of the first part, and A. M. Anderson and E. J. Loring, parties of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gustafson v. Trocke Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sackett v. HaeckelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API