Legal Opinion

Gaeth v. Deacon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 3, 2009No. Docket: Lin-07-466PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Daniel B. Deacon appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Cole, J.) denying his motion for relief from a default judgment brought pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b). The judgment, in favor of William Gaeth, is based on an assault committed in 2002 by Deacon against Gaeth in Waterville. Deacon contends that the default judgment is void because Lincoln County is not the proper venue for the action pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 501 (2008), and therefore service by publication in the Lincoln County News was improper pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 4(g). Deacon further contends…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Islamic Society of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. Peters v. O'LEARYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. MATSCO v. Brighton Family Dental, P.C.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
  5. Antler's Inn & Restaurant, LLC v. Department of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API