Legal Opinion
State v. R.M.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 2021No. 20AP-6PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. R.M.M.,
2021-Ohio-3314.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-6 (C.P.C. No. 19EP-647) v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) [R.M.M.], : Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 21, 2021 On brief: [G. Gary Tyack] Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael P. Walton, for appellee. Argued: Michael P. Walton. On brief: Probst Law Office, Inc., and Michael S. Probst, for appellant. Argued: Michael S. Probst. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas BROWN, J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Bates, Unpublished Decision (5-4-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ClineOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. WelkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2026