Legal Opinion

Grage v. Paulson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1899No. 1,433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Cla/rke County; S. M. Mclntire, Judge. Action by Henry Grage against Tony Paulson, defendant, .and the United Smelting & Refining Company; garnishee: On motion to dismiss appeals.

1Per curiam

It appears from the record herein that two appeals have been taken from two separate orders made after judgment, — one entered on April 15, and one on June 10, 1899. It further appears that only one undertaking, in the sum of $300, is on file with the clerk of the district court to secure both appeals. A motion is made to dismiss the appeals on the ground that the undertaking is void for ambiguity. The motion must be sustained, upon the authority of Creek v. Bozemam, Waterworks Co., 22 Mont. 327, 56 Pac. 362; Murphy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., 22 Mont. 577, 57 Pac. 278; Washoe Copper Co.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Washoe Copper Co. v. HickeyMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Murphy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pirrie v. MouleMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Schwab v. KapplerMontana Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API