Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marsing v. Gem Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1935No. 6268Published

1Concurrence

AILSHIE, J.,

Concurring. — This proceeding calls in question the constitutionality of that portion of sec. 42-610, I. C. A., as amended by chap. 39 of the 1935 Sess. Laws, wherein it is provided that refunding bonds may be issued maturing in a period not exceeding forty years from date of issue. Sec. 3, art. 8 of the Constitution, provides as follows:

“No county, city, town, township, board of education, or school district, or other subdivision of the state, shall incur any indebtedness, or liability, in any manner, or for any purpose, exceeding in that year, the income and revenue provided for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. Executive CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Davis v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Kane v. City of CharlestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State Ex Rel. School District v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API