Legal Opinion

People v. Hogan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1967No. Docket 2,171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

This appellant attacks the sufficiency of the testimony implicating him in a consummated armed robbery, CL 1948, § 750.529 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.797), and the subsequent verdict of guilty entered by the circuit court, sitting without a jury.

Before trial, codefendants James E. Sprinkle and Judith Ann Smith pleaded guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. Both testified against appellant. The information charged defendants Hogan, Sprinkle, and Smith with having robbed one James N. Robinson of $90 while being armed with a pistol on March 30, 1964. Jeanette Robinson testified that she and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SzymanskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. KnollMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. SawickiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. People v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. SnellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. ErohMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. Jimmie RaglandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. CrittleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API