Legal Opinion
Temex Energy, Inc. v. Underwood, Wilson, Berry, Stein & Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1992No. 91-6069PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, District Judge.
Before us again is the question of the appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) of an order of the District Court reversing a final order of the Bankruptcy Court and remanding for further proceedings.1
Appellant law firm Underwood, Wilson, Berry, Stein & Johnson performed certain legal services for a firm Amarex, Inc. in the year 1982. Underwood was paid $886,-292 on account of these services by a legal entity called Amarex Funds, rather than Amarex, Inc. Less than 90 days following this payment, certain creditors of Amarex, Inc. filed an involuntary petition in bankruptcy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Glover, Inc., Debtor. First Bank of Billings, Montana v. Albuquerque National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- In re AtencioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by25 opinions
- In the Matter of Francisco Lopez, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ritzen Grp., Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC (In Re Jackson Masonry, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Chunn v. ChunnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Massachusetts v. First Alliance Mortgage Co. (In Re First Alliance Mortgage Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Masunaga v. Stoltenberg (In Re Rex Montis Silver Co.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.