Legal Opinion

CERICOLA v. Redmon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1956No. Appeals, 31 and 32PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the Court below to grant motions for judgments n.o.v. and for new trials after verdicts for the plaintiffs in actions arising out of an automobile collision at a right angle city street intersection.

The facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, as we are here required to view them, are as follows:

On April 21, 1953, the plaintiff, Cericola, accompanied by his passenger Milano, the other plaintiff, was driving his automobile south on 25th Street in Philadelphia approaching Thompson Street. The defendant, Redmon, was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kline v. KachmarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Rhinehart v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Jordan v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Cardone v. Sheldon Hotel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LaGorga v. Kroger CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Bih-Jing Jeng v. WittersDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Perigo v. DeeganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Antonelli v. TumoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Taylor v. MountzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API