Legal Opinion

McElhinney v. Riganti

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1975No. Civ. No. 43968Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FILES, P. J.

Appellant Muriel McElhinney is the successor administratrix and residuary legatee in this estate. She appeals from the order of March 8, 1973, which disapproved in part her first and final account. The portion not approved was her proposal to charge respondents Julius and Delores Riganti (hereinafter Rigantis) with a share of the estate and inheritance taxes and costs of administration.

*600The basis of the probate court’s decision was that the portion of the decedent’s property which passed to the Rigantis had been received by them free and clear of the burdens of the probate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Thomas v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API