Legal Opinion

Michigan Public Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 29, 1992No. Nos. 90-1580, 91-1025 and 91-1173PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

The Michigan Municipal Cooperative Group petitions for review of three sets of orders by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) related to transactions involving intervenors Consumers Power Company and Palisades Generating Company.1 In all three proceedings, the Commission rejected the Group’s objection that the transaction at issue was likely to have anti-competitive consequences, explaining that the Group’s allegations were too unfounded, premature, and irrelevant to warrant full investigation at a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Michigan Public Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, Palisades Generating Company, Intervenors. Michigan Public Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, Palisades Generating Company, State of Michigan and the Michigan Public Service Commission, Intervenors. Michigan Public Power Agency, Michigan South Central Power Agency, Michigan Municipal Electric Association, Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc., City of Bay City, City of Charlevoix, Village of Chelsea, City of Eaton Rapids, Grand Haven Board of Light and Power, City of Harbor Springs, City of Hart, Holland Board of Public Works, Lansing Board of Water and Light, City of Lowell, City of Petoskey, City of Portland, City of St. Louis, Traverse City Board of Light and Power, and City of Zeeland, Michigan v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992