Legal Opinion

Chilkat Indian Village v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1989No. 86-4312Published

1Opinion of the Court

870 F.2d 1469

CHILKAT INDIAN VILLAGE, a federally recognized Indian Tribe,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Michael R. JOHNSON, an individual, Michael R. Johnson, Inc.,

a Washington Corporation, The Whale House Group,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

State of Alaska, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 86-4312.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 3, 1987.

Decided March 23, 1989.

Donald S. Cooper, Carol H. Daniel, Alaska Legal Services Corp., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellant.

Donna C. Willard, Willoughby & Willard, Anchorage, Alaska, for defendants-appellees.

Douglas K. Mertz,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API