Benjamin Crocker v. County of Amador, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENJAMIN CROCKER, No. 2:26-cv-00691-TLN-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Benjamin Crocker proceeds pro se in this action which is referred to the 18 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff has filed an 19 application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis which makes the showing 20 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) The request will be granted.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.