Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1922No. 21968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Day, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover damages for negligent delay in the transportation of a shipment of live stock from Omaha, Nebraska, to Ansley, Nebraska, September 19, 1918. The defendants are the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, Union Stock Yards Company, Limited, of Omaha, a corporation, James C. Davis, director genera], and agent under the- transportation act of 1920. From a verdict for plaintiff, all defendants appeal.

The defendant Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company contends that a railroad company is not liable on causes of action arising…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Nye-Schneider-Fowler Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Eckman Chemical Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Marsh & Marsh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stark v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rogers v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Zielinski v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hagadone v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. O'Neill v. RovatsosNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API