Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
In the first of these two proceedings (01-91-00681-CV), relator, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (OCF), seeks mandamus relief from respondent’s, Judge Neil Caldwell’s, order in the underlying causes1 requiring it to produce for in camera inspection (1) “costs of services for counsel” documents, and (2) “reserves for asbestos claims losses” documents. Additionally, OCF asks this Court (1) to direct Judge Caldwell to modify another order to provide that an outstanding sanction of $320,-000 in attorneys’ fees be due and payable at or after the time of final judgment,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prime Group, Inc. v. O'NEILLCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- John Tomaszewski and Heather Bryan v. K Hovnanian of Houston II, L.L.C., D/B/A Brighton Home, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
- Prime Group, Inc. v. O'NEILLCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993