Legal Opinion

Brown v. Markland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1898No. 892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from tbe Third district court, Tooele county. A. N. Cherry, Judge. Action by Mary E. Brown against Charles B. MarMand on a contract. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Bartch, J.:

This is an action upon a contract, which, the plaintiff claims, was made for the benefit of herself and others, although she was not a party thereto. It appears that on April 30, 1894, William A. Frailey and associates, owners of a mine, entered into a written contract with the defendant, whereby, for a certain consideration, they agreed to convey their mine to him free of incumbrance, except a mortgage lien, and certain claims of persons for labor performed and materials furnished at the mine, which mortgage and claims, it is contended, the defend-assumed and agreed to pay. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Bradley v. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Swett v. ShumwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Montgomery v. RiefUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Thompson v. CheesmanUtah Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Blyth-Farco Co. v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Fayter v. NorthUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & FraterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API