Legal Opinion
Chaudhry v. Usoskin (In Re Usoskin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 27, 1985No. 8-19-70959PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CECELIA H. GOETZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is an adversary proceeding brought by two creditors, Hukumad Chaudhry and Haridas Shah, of the debtor, Barbara Usos-kin, objecting to the discharge of her debts in bankruptcy. Although their complaint invokes only 11 U.S.C. § 727, covering objections to the discharge in toto of all debts, their post-trial memorandum also implicates § 523(c) which deals with the dis-chargeability of specific debts.
This is a core proceeding which this Court is authorized to hear and determine. 28 U.S. § 157(a), (b)(2)(I) and (J).
For the reasons set out more fully below,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,524 in Re Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers, Debtors. Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers v. Bank of Sheridan, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re UnderhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re Lois Adlman, Bankrupt. Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lois AdlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Baltic Linen Co. v. Rubin (In Re Rubin)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bank of India v. Sapru (In Re Sapru)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Bensenville Community Center Union v. Bailey (In Re Bailey)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- American State Bank v. Montgomery (In Re Montgomery)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Malloy v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Huntington National Bank v. Schwartzman (In Re Schwartzman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.