Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch, Inc. And National Legal & Policy Center v. Hillary Rodham Clinton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 23, 1996No. 95-5070PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Judicial Watch appeals the dismissal of its claim that the Presidential Legal Expense Trust Fund must comply with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2 (1982), and must return all funds collected while in violation of the Act. The district court determined that the Trust is not a federal advisory committee. We affirm.
I
President and Mrs. Clinton established the Trust in order to help defray personal legal fees and related expenses incurred by the President in legal proceedings…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Public Citizen v. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for FoodsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Nader v. BaroodyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. v. GausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Public Citizen v. Commission on the Bicentennial of the United States ConstitutionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
3Cited by26 opinions
- Grand Central Partnership, Inc. v. Andrew Cuomo, as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Southern Everglades Restoration AllianceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Judicial Watch of Florida, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.