Passaic Worsted Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge
Appellants imported at the port of New York several machines of three types — namely, wool openers, dessuinters, and dryers. These were classified by the collector, in each instance, under the provision for “all other textile machinery or parts thereof, not specially pro*460vided for,” in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The importers protested in each instance, claiming the goods to be dutiable under the provision for “all other machines or parts thereof,” in the same paragraph. The court below overruled the protests and the importers have appealed.
The relevant portions of the paragraph…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Whitlock Cordage Co. v. Untied StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Washington International Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005